| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - It was Campbell's argument at trial that Roche had dismissed him so as to avoid paying him those benefits he had been promised through the issuance of an employee handbook.On appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict against it, Roche argues that the employment agreement signed by Campbell did not set out a definite duration of employment and, therefore, that Campbell was an employee at
|
