| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - My argument is that if one insists on arguing a straw-man version of omnipotence where it is a premise of the argument that god can do anything up to and including the impossible, then it is child???s play for that god to not only accurately derive 5 from 2+2 but also to cheefully exist despite being impossible via the law of non-contradiction (the premise of the argument is that god can do anythi
|
