| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - I have a feeling Dawkins threw in the talk of what logicians" were doing for rhetorical show.Probably.I have the following objection to Prof. Feser:Let's define a property:A Loser McWeaksauze is a being for which it is impossible to do anything.Now, consider the coherence of the following statement: Loser McWeaksauze is omnipotentGiven your account of omnipotence, it is not only true, but bein
|
