| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - An examination of the legislative history of CEPA, however, reveals that ?? 22a-17 was not meant to relegate a defendant to disproving a CEPA violation solely by resorting to this affirmative defense ... [Representative Papandrea states that unreasonableness is a matter of fact.] This suggests that the legislature intended that a court would be called upon to consider much more than whether ...
|
