| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - By a related course of reasoning, the Government and some appellees maintain that the must-carry provisions are nothing more than industry-specific antitrust legislation, and thus warrant rational basis scrutiny under this Court's precedents governing legislative efforts to correct market failure in a market whose commodity is speech, such as Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1, 65 S.C
|
