| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Therefore from our scenario the film automaticallyrecorded by a security camera would not be under hearsay but will be real evidence.Thus in R v Spiby7 a print out from a computerised machine which automaticallyrecorded information such as duration of calls was admitted as real evidence.In deciding whether such evidence is admissible, section 69 8provides that astatement in a document produced by
|
