| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - They were dependent on claim 1 and were directed to particular embodiments of the claimed method.IX. The following document is referred to in the present decision:(D4) US-A-5,585,250 (published on 17 December 1996)X. The submissions made by the appellant, insofar as they are relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows:The application contained examples of two variants, one conta
|
