| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Thus, the Board is unable to derive from the filed evidence data which clearly demonstrates that commercial success was based on the Appellant's allegedly inventive contribution to the prior art, i.e. on the fact of not removing the buffer.For the above reasons the Board finds that the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the main request does not involve an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56
|
