| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - He said he thought it was really a gay marriage bill not a civil unions bill and that, even though the the bill as written may not infringe upon the state???s ???one-man, one-woman??? definition of marriage, once on the books, the bill could be reworked to do so. ???This bill is a stepping stone,??? he said. ???I see this as a deep problem in regard to the [constitution] we were sworn to uphold.??
|
