| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - If this is the case, then it would severely undermine Dawkins??? argument, which depends upon the notion that God is improbable.I contend that this simple clarification of definition does not solve Dawkins??? challenge, because it raises the question of whether there is a Godlike being (that is, an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, omniscient spiritual being who is like God in every respect but may or m
|
