{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/170353826"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The New Hampshire case, the chief justice observed, differs from Brown v. Maryland, in that the latter was a case arising out of commerce with foreign nations, which congress had regulated by law; whereas, the case in hand was one of commerce between two states, in relation to which congress had not exercised its power." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "openjurist.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/492177412"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/170353826"] } } }
