{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/216288336"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The Division Bench has observed that the appellants' contention of there being no scope for disciplinary action against the erring employees could not be accepted, especially since the respondents had been granted ad-hoc promotion." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "google.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/284292981"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/216288336"] } } }
