{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/294857963"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "rt to the SEC. In that case, the employee is a whistleblower because he reported to the SEC, but would not be able to assert a retaliation claim on the first two grounds set forth in Section 78-6(h)(1)(A) because he would not be able to show that he was terminated because of his report to the SEC. The employee would, nonetheless, be protected under the third category in that section and could set" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "jdsupra.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/152824390"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/294857963"] } } }
