{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/301989900"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The petition asserts that the court mistakenly applied Supreme Court precedent ???as requiring a seemingly extraordinary deference to the government???s interpretation of a regulation in a case in which the government itself is a financially interested party, [which] amounts to affording a naked preference to a government litigant over its non-governmental adversaries ??? permitting the government" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "appellatetax.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/475524630"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/301989900"] } } }
