{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/302564558"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The Court explained that the ???[u]nconscionability doctrine ensures that contracts, particularly contracts of adhesion, do not impose terms that have been variously described as ???overly harsh,?????? ???unduly oppressive,?????????so one-sided as to shock the conscience,?????? or ???unfairly one-sided.??? All of these formulations point to the central idea that [the] unconscionability doctrine is" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "jdsupra.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/61266797"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/302564558"] } } }
