{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/303007744"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The Court does not settle the ambiguity in the word ???discriminates??? in subsection (b)(4)???leaving open both the appropriate comparison class and the type of differential treatment required to constitute discrimination.[Footnote 3] The majority ???hold[s] only that ??11501(b)(4) enables a railroad to challenge an excise or other non-property tax as discriminatory on the basis of the tax scheme" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "oyez.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/404590340"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/303007744"] } } }
