{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/303502220"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "Why it matters: The decision was a blow to Apple, which had fought the exemption. ???Case law and congressional enactments reflect a judgment that interoperability is favored,??? the decision said. back to top ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York DR 2-101(f) Albany | Los Angeles | New York | Orange County | Palo Alto | Sacramento | San Francisco | Washington, D.C. ?? 2010 Manatt, Phelps & Phi" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "jdsupra.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/376922589"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/303502220"] } } }
