{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/304774941"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "They were dependent on claim 1 and were directed to particular embodiments of the claimed method.IX. The following document is referred to in the present decision:(D4) US-A-5,585,250 (published on 17 December 1996)X. The submissions made by the appellant, insofar as they are relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows:The application contained examples of two variants, one conta" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "epo.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/235240766"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/304774941"] } } }
