{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/305990441"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The gist of this argument is that when we consider the claim that a certain mental event, M, is a cause of another event, R, we see that M??s physical supervenience base, P, has all the credentials to serve as a cause of R, thus threatening to preempt M??s claim to be a cause of R. The only way out for the nonreductivist would seem to be to recognize both M and P each as a full cause of R, making" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "newdualism.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/516198180"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/305990441"] } } }
