{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/105928500"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307028239" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307028239"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The RIAA was arguing that computers and computer peripherals such as mp3 players did fall within AHRA. They wanted this to be the case so that they could 1) get royalties, 2) require computer and peripheral manufacturers to implement the SCMS system of DRM that is mandated by the AHRA. In the case, RIAA v. Diamond, both the district and circuit courts found that computers were outside of the AHRA." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "slashdot.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/18205416"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307028239"] } } }
