{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/331855530"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "During discussions, issues were raised by Indonesia, Norway, Australia, the US, Switzerland, Tuvalu and the EU, including items on: the need for more in-depth work on the distinction between supported and unsupported NAMAs and the role of the Registry; the calculation of BAU scenarios and baselines; identifying the most useful international support for NAMAs; and financial constraints and conditio" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "iisd.ca" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/287481386"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/331855530"] } } }
