{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/348981141"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "e worst physical condition, direct funding is less costly; (4) the variations in costs raise important issues, including whether the federal government should pay for the rehabilitation of public housing developments and the added costs of certificates, and whether housing certificates should be targeted initially to developments where they are clearly cost-effective; (5) HUD has not performed the" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "gao.gov" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/473804172"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/348981141"] } } }
