{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/350217698"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "Peter BrookesAOL Defense's February 29 piece, Hill Turns Up Heat On White House Over 'Law Of The Sea' gives a good presentation of the reasons supporters believe the 1982 Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) should be ratified, but it does not talk about why the treaty was deep-sixed some 30 years ago -- and has remained there since.here is the rest of the story.While LOST's navigational tenets for operat" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "blogspot.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/93685254"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/350217698"] } } }
