{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/38948698"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The court further found that while Dr. Frankel???s opinions may find acceptance under the ???loss of chance??? doctrine, they were not beneficial in a state such as South Carolina which does not recognize that doctrine but instead requires a plaintiff who relies on expert testimony to introduce evidence that the defendant???s negligence most probably resulted in the injuries alleged." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "state.sc.us" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/362556603"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/38948698"] } } }
