{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/431764875"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "And just as the Court in Lukumi rejected the assertion that the city could permit the slaughter of animals for secular purposes while banning their slaughter for religious purposes, Tenafly may not permit certain objects to be placed in its right-of-way for secular purposes and deny the placement of those same kinds of items solely because they will be serving a religious purpose." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "jlaw.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/148540825"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/431764875"] } } }
