{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435575994"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "Appellant argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because there were controverted issues of fact requiring trial.2 As to one of these issues, i.e. whether the contract continued in effect after May 14, 'by action of the parties', an issue with which we will deal later, we have found no genuine controversy since the evidence shows that the courtact was not so continued." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "openjurist.org" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/358361487"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435575994"] } } }
