{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/84348605"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ " field, and especially peer review, all give one perspective and insight that is not otherwise attainable.)DENISE MINGER DEBUNKED:The response to Denise Minger can be divided into 3 parts: ???Denise Minger's Misunderstanding The China Study's objectives and research findings. ???Denise Minger's Excessive reliance on the use of unadjusted correlations in the China database. ???Denise Minger's Failu" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "scribd.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/37156649"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/84348605" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/413707439"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/84348605"] } } }
