<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/296126568>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/201917684> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/201917684>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<osnews.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/199541387>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/201917684> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/201917684>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/201917684>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Please correct me if I am wrong, but you give me the impression that in your view, programming languages are mostly interchangeable, to the point their features might easily be enumerated in a standard way and compared using giant tables without further information.  To a certain extent yes." .