<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/254187190>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<wordpress.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/150788918>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/254187190> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/254187190>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/254187190>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"No; what Minnesota should do ???if there is a need and prospect of a revenue-generating road project (if a road or bridge does not generate at least the cost of building and upkeep, it is not legitimate)??? is what Guernsey did, what Ford/Edison recommended: authorize the issue of notes and pay them out directly to contractors." .