<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/3576340>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/3576340>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<envirolink.org> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/492412711>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/3576340> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/3576340>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	" search test?It is easy to select sections of text and find something to contradict it and the posting copy right rules helps this.When faced with a test that works and is an alternative to painfully killing animals then I would expect any decent person would want it used.Seems I was wrong. some people argue the toss for animal testing for what seems not real reason." .