<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/331076565>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/455810568> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/455810568>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Robert M. says: November 4, 2009 at 11:21 am This might not be all bad, If AGW is a religion and not a science, then any laws using AGW as an excuse can be challenged on the basis that religion cannot be legislated, and the state may not persecute(tax) non-believers." .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/455810568>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/455810568>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<wattsupwiththat.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/332032228>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/455810568> .