<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/157520666>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<dailykos.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/188625884>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/157520666> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/157520666>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/157520666>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Of course, if you really want to push it then I will say I agree with you: my preferred epistemology is rooted in phenomenology (Gadamer's hermeneutics); in that explanation what we call 'fact' is a kind of convention; all we really have are interpretations\" of varying degrees of probability, and all of which are relative (as in Einstein's universe, or quantum physics)." .