{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/320242931"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "By contrast, for Federalists, ???this restraint or deference was a matter of prudence and political expediency: something necessary to secure and preserve judicial (rather than popular) authority by minimizing the risks of overstepping.??? Judicial Supremacy and the End of Judicial Restraint, 100 California Law Review, 621, 625-26 (2012) (emphasis in original)." ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "blogs.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/137619121"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/320242931"] } } }
