<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/405246531>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<dhammawheel.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/405246531>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/405246531>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"The suttas which Dmytro and I cited clearly state that Dhamma-Vicaya and Dhammavicayasambojjhanga must have vicara, and be preceded by vitakka in Sati.It seems this elephant is an illusion.There is no 'must have' in the descriptions of 'dhamma-vicaya' I quote:viewtopic.php?f=23&t=5582For example, pariv??ma???sa without the vicara would still be dhamma-vicaya.Best wishes, Dmytro" .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/58212893>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/405246531> .