And after 35.Bxf6 gxf6[?!] (35...exf6?! 36.Rxh7+!? with attacking chances for both sides) 36.Qg4[!?] with an unclear, yet messy position ... , or worse[!] - to quote from chapter one, page one, in the first opening line of Andrew Soltis', 'Turning Advantage Into Victory in Chess' - The rest is a matter of technique. - unquote What else is apparently 'funny' about the over-usage of these analyti