The majority???s test for what is actionable under the ATS certainly is vague: a norm accepted by the civilized world and defined with a level of specificity comparable to the 18 th century paradigms of such torts. (See Note, The Supreme Court, 2003 Term: Leading Cases, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 248, 446, 454-55 (2004).) One commentator has suggested that assistance in identifying such norms may be found