| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - However, retroactivity is a matter on which judges tend to have "sound . . . instinct[s], see Danforth v. Groton Water Co., 178 Mass. 472, 476, 59 N.E. 1033, 1034 (1901) (Holmes, J.), and familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations offer sound guidance.Thus, it is questionable whether ap
|