| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Consequently, the Board of Appeal acted correctly in taking the view that there was a likelihood of confusion between the signs at issue.50 That conclusion is not invalidated by the applicant???s argument that the earlier trade mark has a weak distinctive character on the ground that a large number of registered marks contain the element ???metro???.51 First, admittedly, the possibility cannot be
|
