| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - on the other hand, you claim (again, badly)that the contractor employee, using equipment purchased specifically with that contract???s payments (maybe, maybe not, since money is a fungible item), to send/receive emails regarding said contract, may be subject to a warrantless search/seizure, solely because of the existence of those emails. hogwash. that the emails are about the contract is irreleva
|
