| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - So, either (a) the willusionists define free will poorly, in which case their claims might lead people to think they lack what they think free will is ??? and that may have bad results ??? plus the evidence discussed would not be particularly relevant, or (b) on a more plausible view of free will, the evidence does not show we lack free will entirely, though again, it might show we have less free
|
