| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - of the lawyer which is not relevant to the issue of whether the plaintiff or defendants by counterclaim violated the Mareva injunction. [45] Only interrogatory #2 remains intact and it is my conclusion that it is unnecessary for the plaintiff and defendants by counterclaim to answer this question which can be easily answered by the defendants themselves through checking the state of title in the L
|
