| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - ontains a digit that differs from the corresponding digit of the anti> diagonal would be assuming that the anti diagonal is not in the list.There is a rule by which just such a situation can be made to occur.And until WM can show why that rule does not achieve the claimed result, which he has often tried but universally failed to do, the proof remains valid. > >> > - You are trying to prove that t
|
