| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Nowhere does Laird say that animals cannot or do not have messages for us, nor does she deny that animals and other beings can be ???both nameless and named, have agency and be acted upon, exist for itself and also exist on behalf of others.??? She is, in essence, making the very same argument that Ravenna was making in her post about ritual approaches to deity: that when we treat other beings as
|
