| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Thus, as courts and commentators have noted, ??all the [Supreme] Court meant [in Mertens and other cases] was that restitution, in contrast to damages, is a remedy commonly ordered in equity cases and therefore an equitable remedy in a sense in which damages, though occasionally awarded in equity cases, are not.?? Reich v. Continental Casualty Co., supra, at 756.
|
