| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Wasn't the magazine's intent more likely to have been to maximize circulation and profit, with harm being collateral damage? -- But perhaps I am being too literal in interpreting intent to harm.ReplyDeleteSheldon ToplittJanuary 30, 2012 at 1:50 PMThere is a right to publicity privacy claim--appropriating the victim's image without her consent.
|
