| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The main request differed from that dealt with in the decision under appeal in that (i) the word human had been replaced by the word mammal in claims 1 and 5 (the latter claim being the former claim 4), (ii) claims 4 and 10 had been added to specify that that the mammal was a human, and in that (iii) claim 11 - reading: The composition of any of claims 1 to 4, for use in medicine. - had
|
