| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - As Garland correctly observes, testimony about impact on victims ???has been criticized for increasing the emotional temperature of an already highly charged process and exerting additional pressure on the jury to return a death sentence.??? In Booth v. Maryland (1987), the Court held that such evidence could serve no purpose other than inflaming the jury and was ???inconsistent with the reasoned
|
