| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - w denying tax, health and other benefits to legally married same-sex couples.That case, from California, hinged on a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.If the justices had acted, it would have struck down gay marriage prohibitions across the country.Instead, the justices passed, relying instead on a technical legal argument to resolve the California case and cl
|
