| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - As the three-justice, lead opinion in Koenig v South Haven, 460 Mich 667, 679 (1999), observed, ???there is a temptation to blur the distinction between direct and incidental beneficiaries because . . . the claims of putative third-party beneficiaries are often compelling.??? Such language is prescient in describing the instant case in which plaintiff is an altogether innocent and sympathetic figu
|
