| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - t on geller. on 24 23 pennsylvania resident over an allegedly tortious fax sent to a 7 2 3 central dist of cal, 503 f2d 384, 387-89 (1974). and although 7 1 that exercise of jurisdiction would be unreasonable; in other plaintiff, 23 26 17 the video clip at the heart of the dispute was filmed in england liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys' court could exercise personal jurisdictio
|
